Hey everybody …• Right here’s the most recent Served podcast:• Right here’s Dana White on 60 Minutes: • This week’s Unsolicited e-book suggestion: Solely God Can Choose Me: The Many Lives of Tupac Shakur by Jeff Pearlman.Onward …We acquired just a few notes and texts concerning the information of high gamers writing to the 4 majors, searching for more cash and enter.• Let’s begin with this premise: Tennis gamers want collective illustration. The present system and construction merely don’t work for them. They’re paid lower than most different skilled athletes, as a proportion of gross income. The 4 greatest occasions don’t pay a cent into their pensions. The work situations—i.e., the calendar, necessary commitments, and bodily and psychological calls for of the tour—are brutal. So many selections get made which have a fabric affect on gamers’ livelihood—Sunday begin and larded 12-day overlapping Masters Sequence occasions—they usually have nearly no enter. Administration is trouncing labor. Let’s name it 6–2, 6-1.Let’s start with the place that any group searching for to spice up the gamers’ pursuits and funds is a power of fine.However, as I wrote just a few weeks in the past, the PTPA merely confounds. Here’s a gamers’ affiliation with, it appears, bottomless funding. It has filed a sweeping federal lawsuit alleging conspiracy, collusion and cartel-like conduct. If profitable, it might radically alter professional tennis as we all know it. Even when unsuccessful, it can value the excursions—that are half player-owned—tens of hundreds of thousands in authorized charges. But, no participant of word publicly helps this group. Splashy because the lawsuit is, the named plaintiffs within the lawsuit include zero top-50 gamers. No notable energetic gamers ever point out the PTPA—a lot much less this federal lawsuit—until requested. They don’t put up about this lawsuit on social media. The one star who co-founded the group, Novak Djokovic, has turned his again and sprinted away, as if chasing down a topspin lob. The one star who has pledged help, Nick Kyrgios, hasn’t performed in months and is deeply problematic.The unseriousness of the PTPA and its void-for-vagueness lawsuit doesn’t negate the basic concern right here: The gamers deserve extra—more cash, extra advantages, and extra voice. So, right here come star gamers with a distinct method. Guided partially by Larry Scott—former ATP government, WTA CEO and, extra just lately, Pac-12 commissioner—a gaggle of high gamers met with officers individually earlier than Roland Garros and Wimbledon. They don’t seem to be submitting existential lawsuits—not but anyway. However via discourse and negotiation, they’re asking that the present income cut up improve from the mid-teens to the low 20s and that the 4 (wildly worthwhile) majors make a contribution to advantages packages.I’m informed that whereas discussions have been cordial, the majors are actually stalling, a time-honored tactic. (Gamers’ careers are finite, however Wimbledon can stay on in perpetuity.) The query now: How aggressive will the highest gamers get in the event that they don’t see some motion?There was plenty of the chatter this week was about Lorenzo Musetti, who was the most recent participant to make regrettable feedback whereas taking part in an occasion in China. • It’s lamentable and unlucky that so many gamers have made comparable remarks in recent times. It’s awfully laborious to defend anybody referencing “these f—— Chinese.” Full cease: Racism is dangerous. Ought to Musetti be condemned? Sure, and he was. Ought to he have apologized? Sure, and he did. However, ought to this be an ineradicable stain? Ought to this disqualify followers from supporting him? Ought to he be cancelled? I might say: laborious no.Nevertheless, there are some nuances and different factors to think about right here.1) There’s the ingredient of punching up vs. punching down. We’ve talked about this earlier than. Considered one of you puzzled whether or not a Chinese language participant blasting Italian followers on the Rome occasion would trigger something near the identical stage of controversy. It possible wouldn’t. And there are causes for that. (We additionally ought to distinguish between race and nationality.)2) I used to be studying Bounces, Ben Rothenberg’s Substack—which I like to recommend—and discovered that Chinese language tennis followers have nicknamed Jessica Pegula “Big Rich,” and Emma Navarro “Little Rich,” referencing their households’ amassed wealth. It is a matter that each gamers strenuously keep away from discussing. This isn’t a flattering shorthand. If an ESPN broadcaster have been to make use of these nicknames, they’d be roundly and angrily criticized. However most of us bake in some cultural sensitivity and an acknowledgement that totally different nations and cultures have totally different requirements. Once more, racism is dangerous. However grace and proportion are good.3) Social media performs an enormous function right here. When the intemperate remarks of Musetti (and Taylor Townsend the earlier week) entered the maw of Weibo, one among China’s largest social media platforms, after which went viral, the controversy accelerated.4) Gamers would do nicely to precise their on-court frustration in ways in which don’t insult nationalities. Gamers would do nicely to think about it their luck to journey the world and never mock customs, mores and tastes which might be totally different from theirs.5) As followers and observers, we might do nicely to think about the general our bodies of labor and conduct, and keep away from dashing to disgrace and cancel due to one regrettable second. After struggling on the Laver Cup, Alexander Zverev fell to Daniil Medvedev within the quarterfinals of the China Open. / David Gonzales-Imagn ImagesJon, I heard you and Andy [Roddick] saying that [Alexander] Zverev is perhaps the Finest Participant By no means to have Gained a Main EVER. I can’t disagree with that. However when will we cease considering he has an opportunity? If a participant’s prime has handed, isn’t it time to [bestow] this on another person?J.Z. NYC• If we’re being trustworthy—and, actually, when are we not?—Zverev most likely will get much less love (and extra schadenfreude) than some other participant. A few of you’ve official causes for withholding affection. Others appear to be doing the tennis equal of hate-watching.From the two-things-can-be-true-at-once division: He’s had an elite profession. He’s the third-best participant on the planet. He’s made the ultimate at three totally different majors. He gained titles and hundreds of thousands and most gamers would chop off a pinky for a fraction of his success. He’s nonetheless solely 28. I might counsel that he stays the BPNTHWAM.And but, that doesn’t foreclose criticism. When you’ve the expertise to win majors and don’t accomplish that, that warrants dialogue. For all his successes, it’s laborious to argue Zverev has maxed out his achievements.Considered one of you talked about Zverev’s unsuccessful Laver Cup marketing campaign. I might not learn an excessive amount of into that. For the reason that summer time, he’s been hampered by a nasty again. (I’m informed that he has taken painkillers which have reacted badly along with his diabetes treatment.) However let’s say this: 2026 is a vital yr for him.Jon, I can’t settle for that Taylor Fritz will take confidence from beating Carlos Alcaraz as you appeared to counsel on Tennis Channel. It’s an exhibition, whether or not you settle for that or not. Let’s see him do it in a significant! Then I’ll be a believer!Anon• Do word that Alcaraz beat Fritz this week in Tokyo, barely per week after the Laver Cup rout.I believe all of us agree that the annual dialogue concerning the Laver Cup’s standing—is it or is it not an exhibition?—has grown tiresome. Nevertheless, I do suppose the discourse has given rise to many attention-grabbing factors that actually strip the query all the way down to the studs: What’s it we wish out of sports activities?The quick reply: emotional buy-in and a few religious funding from the athletes. If it doesn’t matter to them, it possible gained’t matter to the followers. (Conversely, if they’re purchased in, we needs to be, too.)I had a back-and-forth with a reader who identified that the absence of rating factors doesn’t mechanically make an occasion an exhibition. The Olympics, Davis Cup and Billie Jean King Cup don’t provide factors, but nobody thinks these are exhibitions or synthetic occasions of any type. (Likewise, these occasions additionally depart from the rankings when choosing the sphere.) My response: True, however within the Laver Cup—not like the Olympics, Davis Cup and Billie Jean King Cup—rosters are chosen partially primarily based on marketability, not benefit or present type. No Davis Cup captain would say, I would like participant X on my workforce as a result of he may not give us one of the best probability of victory, however he attracts followers and rankings.Jon,I all the time get pleasure from your mailbag posts. However your remark in immediately’s version mentioned that “World” websites for the Laver Cup should not restricted to the U.S. and that nobody needs to be stunned if it’s held exterior the “Lower 48.” The Laver Cup was held in Vancouver solely two years in the past in 2023. I assume you already know that and easily forgot. Hopefully you’re not simply one other American who merely considers Canada to be a part of the “Lower 48.” I anticipate you might hear from different Canucks on this oversight.Iain MacKinnon, Toronto • I’ll chorus from making a 51st state joke and—within the spirit of our neighbors to the north—merely apologize. Sure, after all, the earlier “World” Laver Cup was held in Vancouver, one of many nice cities of the world, which a) is house to one among my favourite eating places and b) is the positioning of one of many nice missed alternatives in NBA historical past.I might be stunned if a North American metropolis hosted the Laver Cup in 2027. If this occasion actually has international ambitions, it must department out. Three places I’ve heard talked about are Hong Kong, Tokyo and Singapore. Make of that what you’ll.Pricey JonLong-time reader expressing appreciation for the ‘Bag. As your media roles and commitments broaden commensurate with your expanding profile and popularity, I really hope you continue to find the time and space to answer your readers’ questions, Wertheim-style, right here on the ‘Bag. Thank you, Jon. Long may it continue.James, Melbourne, Australia• I deeply appreciate that. I’m dedicated to creating time for tennis, it doesn’t matter what. • The Australian Open Wild Card Problem, which can make the most of indoor and out of doors hard-court and carpet skilled tournaments to award an American man and girl a foremost draw wild card into the 2026 Australian Open, will start the week of Oct. 6 for the ladies and Oct. 13 for the lads. The USTA and Tennis Australia have a reciprocal settlement wherein foremost draw singles wild playing cards for the 2026 Australian Open and U.S. Open will probably be exchanged.Extra Tennis on Sports activities Illustrated
Supply hyperlink
What the Prime Gamers Need From the 4 Majors
